Research Archives | Silentia
Contact
Contact

Curtain study reveals insights about antimicrobial curtains vs. privacy screens

Privacy solutions are vital in healthcare, not just for maintaining patient dignity but also for supporting infection control, operational efficiency, and sustainability goals. As hospitals look for ways to protect patients and reduce resource consumption, we combined data from a recent study with our own impact data to help decision-makers evaluate their privacy options with greater accuracy. 

A 2023 study published in Infection Prevention in Practice, an open-access journal from the Healthcare Infection Society, evaluated the performance and efficacy of antimicrobial curtains compared to standard textile curtains, measuring not only infection prevention outcomes but also the real-world costs. The study compares the total impact of the two privacy solutions on infection control, finances, resources, and workflows. 

Join us as we draw even more critical conclusions from the study by comparing the data side-by-side with our own privacy solutions, to gain a better understanding of the total cost of ownership of standard textile curtains, antimicrobial curtains, and Silentia privacy screens. 

Cloth curtains vs. Antimicrobial curtains

Privacy curtains in healthcare settings are frequently overlooked as high-touch surfaces that can harbor harmful pathogens. Due to inconsistent cleaning practices and frequent contact, curtains can contribute to the transmission of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). 

The IPIP curtain study, conducted by the Department of Nursing at Madigan Army Medical Center in Tacoma, WA, aimed to assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial and sporicidal privacy curtains in reducing bacterial contamination. It was conducted in acute care and maternal child units at the hospital. Over 20 weeks, the research compared the bacterial and sporicidal burden on traditional cloth curtains to that on Endurocide™ curtains. Additionally, it analyzed the financial costs associated with both types of curtains, providing insights into their economic feasibility alongside their infection control benefits.

The results of the bacterial count were overwhelmingly in favor of the antimicrobial curtains: 

  • Traditional curtains: 32.6 CFUs
  • Antimicrobial curtains: 0.56 CFUs
  • Reduction: 98.3% (P < 0.05)

From a cost perspective, the study projected annual savings of $20,079.38 with the antimicrobial curtains, largely due to fewer curtain changes, reduced labor time (66.95 hours saved annually), and the elimination of laundering needs.

Silentia Lowery A. Woodall Surgery Center

Antimicrobial curtains vs. Silentia screens

While antimicrobial curtains show promise, Silentia privacy screens offer a fundamentally different approach that combines infection control with improved workflow and long-term cost efficiency.

To draw an accurate comparison, we first evaluated an antimicrobial curtain against a Silentia 5’5″, 9-panel wall-mounted folding screen. This highlights key differences in cost, maintenance, and performance.

While antimicrobial curtains have a lower initial cost, they require regular laundering and replacement, leading to ongoing expenses and labor. In contrast, Silentia screens are reusable, easily disinfected in place, and built to last over 10 years, making them a more efficient, cost-effective, and hygienic long-term solution.

Screen cutain table

Impact analysis

With a clearer, more realistic picture of each solution’s true impact, we can better assess their implications for infection prevention, financial costs, resource efficiency, and operational workflows.

 

1. Infection prevention comparison

Textile curtains are well-known high-touch surfaces and frequent reservoirs for pathogens. Studies have shown that privacy curtains can become contaminated within days of installation, with organisms like MRSA and VRE persisting on fabric surfaces (Ohl et al., 2012). Frequent laundering is required to manage this risk, but practical limitations often mean curtains stay in place longer than ideal, allowing pathogens to spread. 

Antimicrobial curtains address this issue by using fabric treatments that suppress microbial growth between launderings. The 2023 study confirmed they harbor fewer pathogens over time than untreated textiles and require fewer changes, improving infection control compliance. Their performance, however, still depends on physical handling and timely exchange, leaving potential gaps if protocols are missed.

Antimicrobial surfaces can help delay early biofilm formation but are not foolproof, with unclear long-term effectiveness. Relying on them may give a false sense of security, diverting attention from essential cleaning and hygiene practices, and potentially contributing to multidrug-resistant bacteria. What’s more, bacterial reduction with silver-based coatings can take up to 24 hours, so the hygienic benefits are not immediate, therefore potentially exposing patients during that period. 

Silentia privacy screens offer the most consistent approach. Unlike fabric, hard surfaces are non-porous and easily disinfected between patients. This supports immediate, on-the-spot decontamination, aligning with modern infection control protocols.

 

2. Financial cost comparison

Standard textile curtains are inexpensive to purchase, which makes them seem cost-effective at first glance. However, costs quickly climb when you factor in laundering, labor, and regular replacements due to contamination or wear. 

Antimicrobial curtains, as detailed in the study, help reduce microbial load and extend the time between changes. They helped reduce direct materials costs and indirect costs, including reductions in laundering and staff time. Still, they require periodic replacement, offering only a moderate improvement in total cost of ownership. 

Silentia privacy screens carry a higher initial cost, but that investment pays off over time (typically in 1-3 years). Unlike any type of curtain, privacy screens don’t need to be frequently laundered or replaced, dramatically cutting recurring operational costs and delivering long-term savings.

3. Environmental impact comparison

Textile curtains demand significant water, electricity, and chemical use due to laundering, transporting, and reinstalling, putting a strain on environmental resources. 

Antimicrobial curtains reduce this burden by needing fewer changes but still put a quantifiable strain on resources for cleaning, reinstalling, storage, and disposal. Silver ions are highly toxic to bacteria, viruses, fungi, and some aquatic life even at low concentrations, which is why they’re used as antimicrobials. In the environment, silver tends to bind with particles and accumulate in sludge or sediment, but under certain conditions, such as low pH, it can re-enter solution. This raises concerns about long-term environmental and food chain impacts, especially when silver-containing sludge is used as fertilizer and absorbed by crops. 

Silentia screens eliminate the need for laundering altogether. They can be cleaned and disinfected in place with wipes or surface cleaners—drastically cutting water, energy, and chemical consumption. Their durable, decades-long lifespan means fewer materials enter the waste stream, helping hospitals meet sustainability targets while lowering long-term resource use. 

 

4. Workflow and operational comparison

Changing textile curtains is labor-intensive. Staff must remove, transport, and reinstall each curtain—a process that takes 15–20 minutes per exchange. Even when changed only every six months (or after isolation patients), this disruption to patients and room downtown adversely affects delivery of care. 

Antimicrobial curtains reduce exchange frequency, easing some of the burden. But they still require manual removal, replacement, and laundering—just less often. The study confirms they help, but don’t eliminate the workload.  

Silentia screens remove this task entirely. Once installed, they are cleaned quickly in place, allowing for immediate room turnover without disrupting workflows. They are also easy to use and maneuver, without creating a hazard or impeding staff’s ability to monitor patients and equipment.

 

Central Hospital Växjö

Case story: Central Hospital Växjö

See the data in action! Read about Central Hospital Växjö, where Silentia screens have been in continuous use for over 30 years without replacement. Beyond cost savings, the hospital has seen improved patient hygiene and increased staff efficiency as major benefits (Silentia Impact Report).

READ CASE STORY

Request your ROI analysis

 

Thanks to the 2023 Infection Prevention in Practice study, we now have clearer data that conveys the true total cost of ownership of commonly used privacy solutions. While textile and antimicrobial curtains may seem cost-effective at first, the evidence shows that beyond a low upfront purchase cost, there exist hidden long-term costs and infection risks make them less viable over time. 

Silentia privacy screens offer a hygienic, efficient, and sustainable alternative. With their long lifespan, easy cleaning, and proven return on investment, they meet today’s healthcare demands for safety, efficiency, and responsibility.

Visit our Compare us page to learn more about how privacy screens compare to curtains, or connect with us to receive an analysis for your department or facility!

9 statistics that reveal the risks of privacy curtains

Hospitals aim to provide the highest level of treatment and recovery by creating the best environment to facilitate care. This expectation is universally shared by both patients receiving care and the healthcare workers delivering it.

To achieve this, hospitals implement infection prevention and control measures through proper cleaning and handling of equipment, materials, and surfaces. However, patient privacy barriers are among the most important of these yet tend to get overlooked—it’s the elephant in the room.

Why are hospital curtains a threat to patients' wellbeing?

Most hospitals across the U.S. still use fabric cubicle curtains as privacy barriers in perioperative rooms, intensive care units, emergency rooms and others. The problem with privacy curtains is that they require regular cleaning and maintenance procedures, and this is where healthcare facilities fall short. In our experience, many hospitals lack the resources to address this, including:

  • Privacy solutions that promote hygiene
  • Staff and budget resources for proper cleaning procedures
  • Alignment between Infection Prevention, EVS and care teams

Studies show, without proper care and maintenance, privacy curtains can become breeding places for bacteria. At the same time, data shows that the threat of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) is quite prevalent and can be very costly. We gathered nine key statistics from a handful of studies that reveal the risks of fabric hospital curtains.

1. 1 in 25 U.S hospital patients is diagnosed with an HAI

Healthcare-Associated Infections are diseases patients contract while still receiving treatment for other conditions. According to a CDC Winnable Battles report, one in every 25 patients in U.S hospitals is diagnosed with a hospital care-related infection annually. Many HAIs result from dangerous antibiotic-resistant bacteria and can further cause deterioration of a patient’s health and even lead to death.

Dirty and contaminated curtains serve as a habitat for bacteria and other pathogens. Unfortunately, as the study shows, only one-third of U.S healthcare facilities adhere to significant guidelines and requirements needed to regulate HAIs, with only 40% of hospitals putting in place essential hygiene measures.

2. Costs for treatment for HAIs reaches $45 billion

The challenges of cleaning and replacing curtains in hospitals can have widespread economic impacts on the operations of healthcare facilities. Treating and handling infections that spread as a result of contaminated privacy curtains is costly.

As the CDC reported in 2015, U.S hospitals spend an estimated $28.4 to $45 billion annually on treating HAIs. However, with proper medical practice and modern technology use, healthcare facilities can reduce the cost of treating HAIs by 20%.

3. 92% of curtains contaminated by bacteria within a week

A publication by the American Journal of Infection Control (AJIC) places privacy curtains at the center of most bacterial infections in hospitals. A longitudinal study performed on 43 curtains in hospitals over three weeks in 30 rooms, including 2 ICUs, found out that 12 in every 13 curtains (92%) were contaminated by bacteria within a week.

4. 95% of curtains contaminated by bacteria at least once

Further results published by the AJIC from the same study found that 41 of the 43 curtains (95%) were contaminated at least once for a three-week period. Considering this data, only 5% of patients in hospitals would be safe from exposure to HAIs caused by dirty hospital curtains.

5. 42% of curtains contaminated with VRE

The American Journal of Infection statistics also involved studies on the persistence of specific bacteria on curtains in the hospital. The research found out that 42% of the 43 curtains studied were contaminated with VRE, with 8 curtains showing VRE contamination on various occasions. Among the eight, three privacy curtains had a single persistent VRE type while five had different types, possibly due to recurrent contamination.

6. 21% of curtains contaminated with MRSA

The AJIC research also found that among the 43 curtains studied, 21% were determined to be contaminated by MRSA. MRSA bacteria are antibiotic-resistant and cause staph infection. They can live harmlessly on human skin but can become detrimental if they find their way into the human body. Due to their resistance to antibiotics, MRSA spreads faster in hospitals and other healthcare facilities.

7. Persistence of nosocomial pathogens on hospital fabrics

The prevalence of MRSA infections in healthcare facilities has been worsened by the presence of contaminated hospital surfaces, including floors, furniture, and cubicle curtains. Pathogens such as bacteria can survive on hospital fabrics for several days or even months.

A study published by The Eurasian Journal of Medicine shows that methicillin-sensitive and -resistant staphylococci could live for up to 90 days on different types of fabric. Additionally, the research outlined that wool, polyester, and acrylic provide a good harboring place for S. aureus.

8. Bacteria spread within 1 day of contamination

As outlined earlier, antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as MRSA and VRE stay on fabrics from 1 to 90 days. The survival of these organisms on hospital surfaces means they can be transferred as quickly as within one day, according to research by the Journal of Clinical Microbiology. Patients and health workers can easily transmit bacteria to other people within the health facility after coming in contact with contaminated surfaces.

9. 37% of hospitals only launder soiled curtains

According to a 2013 study published by the American Journal of Infection Control 37% of hospitals wait until their curtains are visibly soiled before cleaning them. Contaminated surfaces undermine the efforts of many healthcare facilities to control the spread of HAIs. To regulate the spread of HAIs, hospital hygiene must be prioritized.

How healthcare teams can reduce contamination in hospitals

Infection prevention and control should be the key focus of every healthcare facility. As evidenced above, fabric privacy curtains are breeding grounds for bacteria and are hard to keep clean, therefore, are major inhibitors to proper patient care.

Silentia privacy screens provide you with an alternative solution that protects your patients in the most efficient and economical way. Unlike fabric hospital curtains, our solid surfaces are easy to clean, instantly in the room, with typical disinfectants. Learn more about how Silentia can help your team decrease contamination risk and increase efficiency.